Authorship

نویسنده

  • Soo Young Kim
چکیده

The editorial board of the Korean Journal of Family Medicine has received several queries, especially regarding publication ethics. Among the many areas of research publication ethics, the authorship dispute has been one of the most popular issues. Some authors may request the addition of an extra author or removal of others. Sometimes, they want co-authorship (co-first authorship or co-corresponding authorship). In the process of responding to such queries, we realized that many researchers may have some misunderstandings about authorship. The first misunderstanding could be about the concept of authorship. An ‘author’ is generally considered to be ‘someone who has made substantive intellectual contributions to a published study.’ According to the recommendation of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, authorship is based on the following four criteria: (1) substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; (2) drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; (3) final approval of the version to be published; and (4) agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. Acquisition of funding, collection of data, or general supervision of the research group alone does not constitute authorship. A ghost author is someone who is omitted from an authorship list despite qualifying for authorship, and a guest or gift author is someone who is listed as an author despite not qualifying for authorship. In Korea, such authorship problems may be considered as research misconduct. The second misunderstanding may be about the ownership of responsibility for identifying who meets these criteria. It is the collective responsibility of the authors, not the journal, to ascertain that all people named as authors meet all the four criteria. Hence, requests for removal of authors or addition of an extra author may be accepted only if all the authors agree to the change (including excluded or included author).

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

A Survey on Authorship Analysis

The paper discusses about the problem of Authorship analysis, different types of authorship analysis’s such as authorship attribution, authorship identification, authorship profiling, plagiarism detection. It also addresses the issues in Indian language text. Keywords— Authorship attribution, authorship profiling, plagiarism detection, text classification.

متن کامل

Mapping co-authorship network of Iranian researchers in the field of knowledge management

Background and aim: So far, many researches have been conducted on the co-authorship study of all authors of universities and organizations as one of the most important topics in the field of scientometrics in various fields and disciplines. The aim of this study was to map the co-authorship network of Iranian researchers in the field of knowledge management in Web of Science (WoS). Material a...

متن کامل

Appearance of ghost and gift authors in Ugeskrift for Læger and Danish Medical Journal.

INTRODUCTION Authorship should establish accountability and transparency, but previous research into authorship has demonstrated that authors do not always meet the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors' (ICMJE) authorship criteria. Yet, these studies have mainly focused on international, high-impact journals. The aim of the present study was to assess Danish authors' general autho...

متن کامل

A survey on collaboration rate and co-authorship in published articles of Rostaniha (Botanical Journal of Iran) during 2000 to 2014

In this study, coefficient group collaboration and co-authorship papers published in Rostaniha journal (Botanical Journal of Iran) from 2000 to 2014 has been done. In addition,identifying the most active authors, organizations or institutions are involved in publishing articles group (co-authorship) and the countries with the highest participation and cooperation in the production of articles a...

متن کامل

Authorship, Practical Authorship and Documentary Boundary Objects in Archaeological Information Work

On the basis of an empirical investigation of archaeological information work, this paper discusses the interplay of authorship of documents and documentary boundary objects, and the practical authorship of social situations and identities and how a closer look at the authorship (as understood in the contemporary authorship literature) can be helpful in elaborating our understanding of the maki...

متن کامل

Co-Authorship Networks of Scientific Collaboration

This study analyzes collaborative and networked academic authorship in higher education. The literature review shows evidence that single authorship has made a gradual paradigm shift to joint authorship. The empirical evidence from the Turku University of Applied Sciences indicates that collaborative authorship has notably increased in the last few years. Co-authorship has extended outside the ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره 37  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2016